Sensor Penyiaran Televisi Indonesia : Menyoal Muatan Negatif Dalam Konten Siaran Televisi

Authors

  • Novy Khusnul Khotimah Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten Kuningan
  • Dessy Kushardiyanti IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v6i1.304

Keywords:

Censorship, Broadcast, Television, Procedure, Quality

Abstract

Censorship on television becomes a polemic in society, especially when censorship is carried out on certain images which even become controversial because they are considered unrealistic. Various parties regretted it, but not a few criticized and blamed the government in this case KPI and LSF for their ignorance of the censorship system on television. Although the issue of censorship is not the realm of the KPI in a pragmatic manner, it still has a big role to play in this situation because it governs the policy. How to make and apply laws and regulations when applied by television practitioners so that it gives rise to various interpretations including the irrelevant censorship. Analytical descriptive research method is used in reviewing this research by making an actual and factual path analysis regarding the facts, policies and implications of television broadcasting industry policies. The results of this study indicate that there is a need for intense supervision from KPI and LSF in their capacity to censor television station programs and anticipate the various censorship limits of television companies as a result of differences in human resources and technology capabilities and the application of censorship.

References

Buku

Armando, Ade. 2015. Remotivi, Sebuah Buku dan Pilihan di Jalan Sepi, Orde Media,Yogyakarta : Insistpress, 2-6.

Juliana, A., & Kristanty, S. (2018). Peran komisi penyiaran indonesia dalam mengawasi program tayangan kartun. pantarei, 2(2).

McQuail, Denis.2012. Teori Komunikasi Massa, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Rahayu, dkk. 2015. Menegakkan Kedaulatan Telekomunikasi dan Penyiaran di indonesia. Yogyakarta: PR2Media-Yayasan Tifa.

Rianto, Puji, Iwan Awaluddin Yusuf, Wishnu Martha Adiputra, dkk. 2012. Dominasi TV Swasta (Nasional). Yogyakarta: PR2Media-Yayasan Tifa.

Sari, A. A. A. M. M., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Fungsi Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia terhadap Pelanggaran Siaran Televisi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(2), 18-23.

Thaniago, Roy. 2015. Orde Media : Sebuah Pengantar,Orde Media,Yogyakarta: Insistpress, 7-18.

Wicakson, R. A. (2020). Regulasi Blur di Televisi Indonesia (Peran KPI dan LSF dalam Penerapan Blur atas Konten Siaran).

Williams Raymond, 2009. Televisi. Yogjakarta: Resist Book

Zhu, Ji.-H., & Deborah, B. (1997). Media Agenda-Setting Theory : Telling the Public What to Think About. In E. Kovacic (Ed.), Emerging Theories of Human Communication (pp. 88–114). State University of New York Press.

Jurnal

Challaby, Jean K. 2010. The rise of Britain’s super-indies: Policy-making in the age of the global media market, The International Communication Gazette, 72 (8) 675-693

Kitley, Philip. 2008. In court with the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission: old battles and new identities in the context of reform, The Pacific Review, 21:3, 351-367

Kriyantono, R. (2014). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Prenada Media.

Kwon, S. H., & Kim, J. 2013. From censorship to active support: The Korean state and Korea’s cultural industries The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(4), 517–532

Kwon, S. H., & Kim, J. 2014. The cultural industry policies of the Korean government and the Korean Wave. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4), 422-439.

Wahyuni, Hermin Indah.2006. Ekonomi Politik Kebijakan Penyiaran Indonesia: Aspirasi, Pilihan, dan Realitas”. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, Vol. 10, No. 2 .

Undang-Undang

Undang-Undang Penyiaran No. 32 tahun 2002

PP No.7 tahun 1994 tentang LSF. Sesuai dengan bunyi pasal 15 tentang tata kerja LSF. Pasal 4, 5 dan 6 dalam PP No.7 tahun 1994. Pasal 1 tentang ketentuan umum dalam PP No.7 tahun 1994.

Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran (P3) dan Standar Program Siaran (SPS)” PERATURAN KOMISI PENYIARAN INDONESIA Nomor 01/P/KPI/03/2012

Internet

Anand, Bagus. 2016. Negeri Sensor Terima kasih KPI, https://www.kompasiana.com/radenbaguska/

negeri-sensor-terima-kasih-kpi_56d1b75a8d7a61b82a38c659, Diakses 13 Desember 2017

Anonim. 2017. KPI Bertanggungjawab Ciptakan SDM Penyiaran Berkualitas. http://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/33793-kpi-bertanggungjawab- ciptakan-sdm-penyiaran-berkualitas. Diakses 15 Desember 2017

Dian, Priscilia, 2016, Balada KPI, LSF, Susu dan Belahan Dada, https://www.kompasiana.com/priscilla23/balada-kpi-lsf-susu-dan-belahan dada_56d014ad737e61d31dc30b80 , Diakses 10 Desember 2017

Fajar.2013. Konvensi RSKKNI Produser TV.https://kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail /3464/Konvensi+RSKKNI+Produser+TV/0/berita_satker. Diakses 15 Desember 2017

Triyono, Heru, 2016, https://beritagar.id/artikel/bincang/ketua-kpi-yuliandre-darwis-blur-di- televisi-itu- lebay. Diakses 13 Desember 2017

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Novy Khusnul Khotimah, & Dessy Kushardiyanti. (2022). Sensor Penyiaran Televisi Indonesia : Menyoal Muatan Negatif Dalam Konten Siaran Televisi. Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v6i1.304