Symbolic Communication in Ludruk Art Group Karya Budaya Mojokerto

Authors

  • Evi Nur Fadillah IAIN Kediri
  • Dinar Ayu Chandra Agustin Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v8i2.2497

Keywords:

Symbolic Communication, Symbolic Interactionism, Ludruk Art

Abstract

The form of communication is a form of communication through symbols and symbols. However, what are the forms and obstacles encountered when conveying it through the ludruk art performance media. This research is in the realm of field research. The research approach uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Sources of data using secondary and primary data sources. The results of this study explain that the form of symbolic communication in the first LKBM ludruk art group was in the form of arek language as a ludruk player's self-concept in positioning himself and as a ludruk player. Second, a form of symbolic communication through the symbolic movement of the LKBM ludruk art which goes through the mind process of a ludruk player in taking action to draw the meaning of the message content to the audience. Third, a form of symbolic communication through symbolic costumes of LKBM ludruk art with interpretation in the community (society) in interpreting symbols. Fourth, symbolic communication in the form of direct communication between ludruk players and the audience. Through one-way communication (one-way communication) and two-way communication (two-way communication).

Keywords: Symbolic Communication, Symbolic Interactionism, Ludruk Art

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpian, Yayan, Sri Wulan, Unika Wiharti, and Nizma maratos Soleha. 2019. “Pentingnya Pendidikan Bagi Manusia.” Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi 2 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36805/jurnalbuanapengabdian.v1i1.581.

Azzahro, Ajeng Aulia, and R. Indriyanto. 2019. “Interaksi Simbolik Pada Pertunjukan Sintren Desa Luwijawa Kecamatan Jatinegara Kabupaten Tegal.” Jurnal Seni Tari 8 (1): 103–10. https://doi.org/10.15294/jst.v8i1.31075.

Bachri, Bachtiar S. 2010. “Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif.” Teknologi Pendidikan 10: 46–62.

Badan Pengembangan, and Pembinaan Bahasa. 2016. “KBBI DARING.” Kemdikbud. 2016. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/simbolis.

Bahasa, Badan Pengembanagan Dan Pembinaan. 2023. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.” Kemdikbud. 2023. https://kbbi.web.id/bentuk.

Dewi, Agustina Kusuma. 2019. “Kajian Pakaian Sebagai Pesan Dalam Film Studi Kasus Kostum Karakter Kylo Ren Dalam Film Star Wars : The Force Awakens.” Wimba : Jurnal Komunikasi Visual 10 (1): 13. https://doi.org/10.5614/jkvw.2019.10.1.2.

Djaelani, Aunu Rofiq. 2013. “TEKNIK PENGUMPULAN DATA DALAM PENELITIAN KUALITATIF.” PAWIYATAN Vol 20 (1): 1. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/251834.

Eko Crys Endrayadi, Fathur Rozi. 2022. “Eksistensi Kelompok Ludruk Merdeka di Kecamatan Kencong Kabupaten Jember Tahun 1975-2020.” Historia 4 (2): 635.

Endraswara, Suwardi. 2017. Antropologi Wayang Simbolisme, Mistisisme, Dan Realisme Hidup. Morfalingua.

H.S, Sunaryo. 2020. “Ludruk : Pengertian Dan Sejarah Perkembangan.” Pusaka Jawatimuran. 2020. https://jawatimuran.disperpusip.jatimprov.go.id/2011/11/17/ludruk-pengertian-dan-sejarah-perkembangan/.

Hendro, Eko Punto. 2020. “Simbol : Arti , Fungsi , Dan Implikasi Metodologisnya” 3 (2): 159.

Hutapea, Edison. 2016. “Identifikasi Diri Melalui Simbol-Simbol Komunikasi (Studi Interaksionisme Simbolik Komunitas Pemakai Narkoba Di DKI Jakarta).” Bricolage: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi 2 (1): 10–11.

Ihsanudin. 2019. “Polemik ‘Tulisan Arab’ Pada Busana Agnes Monica (Analisis Teori Interaksionisme Simbolik).” Palita: Journal of Social-Religion Research 4 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v4i1.526.

Ismawati. 2017. “Sejarah Kesenian Ludruk Karya Budaya Mojokerto Tahun 1969 – 2009.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah 5 (3): 1.

Jaelani, Abdul Fatah. 2019. “Kajian Struktur Pertunjukan Ludruk Tobong Di Ponorogo.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Unesa 1 (13): 13.

Kusuma, Ade. 2010. “Pengantar Komunikasi Antar Budaya.” PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 1–6.

Lisbijanto, Herry. 2013. Ludruk. Graha Ilmu.

Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. 2011. Teori Komunikasi, Theory of Human Communication. Salemba Humanika.

Muslim, Ibnu Fiqhan, Fahmi Salsabila, and Priyono. 2022. “The Urgence of Two-Way Communication Model in the Education Process The Urgence of Two-Way Communication Model in the Education Process.” Jurnal Pendidikan Intelektium 3 (2): 150.

Purnomo, Heny, and Lilik Subari. 2019. “Manajemen Produksi Pergelaran : Peranan Leadership Dalam Komunitas Seni Pertunjukan.” Satwika 3 (2): 119.

Rahmania. 2019. “Komunikasi Intrapersonal Dalam Komunikasi Islam.” Jurnal Peurawi 2 (1): 80.

Respati, Dhimas. 2018. “Ngarek, Deskripsi Karya Seni.” Skripsi Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta.

Restian, A, B D Regina, and D Wijoyanto. 2022. Seni Budaya Jawa Dan Karawitan. -. UMMPress. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=inNrEAAAQBAJ.

Rosyidah, Masayu, and Rafiqa Fijra. 2021. “Metode Penelitian.” In , 77. Yogyakarta: Deepublish. https://www.shutterstock.com.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Evi Nur Fadillah, & Chandra Agustin, D. A. (2024). Symbolic Communication in Ludruk Art Group Karya Budaya Mojokerto. Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 8(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v8i2.2497

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Mediakita : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.