Rekonstruksi Paradigma Studi Islam Pasca Orientalisme Melalui Pendekatan Fenomenologi Richard C. Martin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/empirisma.v32i2.1178Keywords:
Phenomenological Approach, Richard C. Martin, Islamic Studies, Post-OrientalismAbstract
This article aims to illustrate how the phenomenological approach developed by Richard C. Martin can be used to strengthen post-Orientalist Islamic studies. In this article, we outline the key concepts in phenomenology according to Richard C. Martin, including intuition, description, and reflection. This article then explains how this approach can be applied to Islamic studies. Using a phenomenological approach, researchers can gain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of religious experiences in Islam. Furthermore, this article discusses the benefits and implications of phenomenology in Islamic studies. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature review type of research, which means that data are collected from various existing sources, such as books, journals, articles, and writings related to the study of Islam through phenomenology in the view of Richard C. Martin. The use of a phenomenological approach can help overcome some of the challenges in Islamic studies, such as researchers’ subjectivity and diversity of interpretation. Using this approach, researchers can explore a broader understanding of the diversity of religious experiences in Islam and respect individual perspectives. In conclusion, this article presents the phenomenological approach developed by Richard. Martin could be a useful tool for strengthening Islamic studies. By understanding religious experiences in Islam through a phenomenological lens, researchers can achieve a deeper understanding and encourage dialog and understanding between individual Muslims and non-Muslims inherited by old orientalists.
References
Ahimsa-Putra, Heddy Shri. “Fenomenologi Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi Untuk Memahami Agama.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 20, no. 2 (December 15, 2012): 271–304. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.20.2.200.
Allen, Douglas. “Phenomenology of Religion.” In The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion. Routledge, 2005.
Bleicher, Josef. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. Routledge, 2017.
Bulhof, I. N. Wilhelm Dilthey: A Hermeneutic Approach to the Study of History and Culture. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
Caecaria, Zahvita. “Fenomena Hermeneutika dalam Islam.” Al-Amwal 11, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36341/al-amwal.v11i2.213.
Connolly, Peter. Approaches to the Study of Religion. A&C Black, 2001.
Dilthey, Wilhelm, and Frederic Jameson. “The Rise of Hermeneutics.” New Literary History 3, no. 2 (1972): 229–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/468313.
Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Free Press, 1965.
Ernst, Carl W., and Richard C. Martin. Rethinking Islamic Studies: From Orientalism to Cosmopolitanism. Univ of South Carolina Press, 2012.
Fangidae, Tony Wiyaret, and Dina Datu Paonganan. “Filsafat Hermeneutika: Pergulatan Antara Perspektif Penulis Dan Pembaca.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 3, no. 3 (September 26, 2020): 102–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v3i3.26007.
Farida, Elok Noor, and Kusrini Kusrini. “Studi Islam Pendekatan Hermeneutik.” JURNAL PENELITIAN 7, no. 2 (September 27, 2013). https://doi.org/10.21043/jupe.v7i2.820.
Harrington, Austin. “Dilthey, Empathy and Verstehen A Contemporary Reappraisal.” European Journal of Social Theory 4, no. 3 (August 1, 2001): 311–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310122225145.
Huda, Sholihul. “Ragam Pendekatan Studi Islam Prespektif Richard C. Martin.” Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 7, no. 1 (June 11, 2021): 121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/ah.v7i1.8483.
Huda, Sokhi. “Kritik Pemikiran Richard C. Martin Dalam Studi Agama Dan Relevansinya Dengan Studi Islam Di Indonesia.” Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 4, no. 1 (March 3, 2014). https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.
Ihsan, Akmal, Sulaiman Sulaiman, Syafira Anisatul Izah, and Alan Budi Kusuma. “Implementation of Richard C. Martin’s Thought in Modern Islamic Studies 5.0 (Approaches to Islamic Religious Studies).” Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2022): 304–19. https://doi.org/10.24952/tazkir.v8i2.5762.
Ismail, Ahmad Faizol bin, Zulkifli bin A. Manaf, Jamalluddin bin Hashim, and Mohd Sufian bin Moktar. “Penggunaan Teknik Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Dalam Penyelidikan Bidang Pengajian Islam [The Use of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Techniques in Islamic Studies Research].” Jurnal Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporari 11 (October 1, 2015): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37231/jimk.2015.11.3.133.
Kasdi, Abdurrohman, Umma Farida, and Choirul Mahfud. “Islamic Studies and Local Wisdom at PTKIN in Central Java: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects of Pioneering Religious Moderation in Indonesia.” HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies 6, no. 1 (June 19, 2020): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v6i1.2618.
Kurzman, Charles, and Carl W. Ernst. “Islamic Studies in US Universities.” In 8 Islamic Studies in US Universities, 320–48. New York University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479827787.003.0009.
Lary, Diana. “Edward Said: Orientalism and Occidentalism.” Journal of the Canadian Historical Association / Revue de La Société Historique Du Canada 17, no. 2 (2006): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.7202/016587ar.
Lofton, Kathryn. “Religious History as Religious Studies.” Religion 42, no. 3 (July 1, 2012): 383–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2012.681878.
Mahmudin, Afif Syaiful. “Pendekatan Fenomenologis Dalam Kajian Islam.” At-Tajdid: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam 5, no. 01 (2021): 83.
Martin, Richard C., ed. Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies. Tucson, Ariz: University of Arizona Press, 1985.
———. “Islamic Studies in the American Academy: A Personal Reflection.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78, no. 4 (December 1, 2010): 896–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq089.
———. “September 11: Clash of Civilizations or Islamic Revolution?” In Roads to Reconciliation: Conflict and Dialogue in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, 2005.
———. “The Uses and Abuses of Criticism in the Study of Islam: A Response to Aaron Hughes1.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24, no. 4–5 (January 1, 2012): 371–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341238.
Martin, Richard C. 1938-. Islamic Studies: A History of Religions Approach. 2. ed. Prentice Hall, 1996.
Mujib, Abdul. “Pendekatan Fenomenologi Dalam Studi Islam.” Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 6, no. 2 (November 15, 2015): 167–83. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v6i2.1485.
Muslih, Mohammad, Abdul Rohman, Yusuf Al Manaanu, and Abdul Aziz. “Pengembangan Ilmu Sosial Model Fenomenologi dan Hermeneutika.” Hermeneutika : Jurnal Hermeneutika 7, no. 1 (May 31, 2021). https://doi.org/10.30870/hermeneutika.v7i1.10160.
Na’imah, Tri. “Pemikiran Richard C. Martin Tentang Islam Dan Studi Agama Serta Implikasinya Dalam Kajian Psikologi.” KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 13, no. 1 (August 27, 2019): 57–64. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v13i1.1997.
Pals, Daniel L. Seven Theories of Religion. IRCiSoD, 1996.
Rahman, Ryan Arief, Rodhi Hakiki Bin Cecep Mustopa, Muhammad Dhiaul Fikri, Amir Reza Kusuma, and Abdul Rohman. “Diskursus Fenomenologi Agama Dalam Studi Agama-Agama.” Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama 16, no. 2 (December 28, 2021): 147–78. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsla.v16i2.9853.
Rijali, Ahmad. “Analisis Data Kualitatif.” Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 17, no. 33 (January 2, 2019): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374.
Saaduddin, K. A. M. “Sociological Approach to Research on Religion: Bangladesh Perspectives.” Religious Studies in South Asia: The Dhaka Initiative 8, no. 1 (2011): 19.
Said 210, Edward W. “Orientalism Reconsidered.” In Literature Politics & Theory. Routledge, 2003.
Said, Edward. “Orientalism and After.” In A Critical Sense. Routledge, 1996.
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. Vintage, 1979.
Sholikah, Sholikah. “Pemikiran Hermeneutika Wilhelm Dilthey (1833 – 1911 M).” Al Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7, no. 2 (2017): 109–20. https://doi.org/10.36835/hjsk.v7i2.3285.
Sidik, Humar, and Ika Putri Sulistyana. “Hermeneutika Sebuah Metode Interpretasi Dalam Kajian Filsafat Sejarah.” AGASTYA: JURNAL SEJARAH DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA 11, no. 1 (January 31, 2021): 19–34. https://doi.org/10.25273/ajsp.v11i1.6224.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. Modern Islam in India. Muhammad Ashraf, 1963.
———. “The Study of Religion and the Study of the Bible.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion XXXIX, no. 2 (June 1, 1971): 131–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/XXXIX.2.131.
Solikin, Nur. “The Approach of Islamic Studies In Mapping Richard C. Martin.” An-Nisa’: Journal of Gender Studies 14, no. 2 (2021): 145–54.
Sulaeman, Mubaidi. “Mistisisme Jalal Al-Din Al-Rumi Dalam Perspektif Annemarie Schimmel.” Jurnal Ilmiah Spiritualis: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Tasawuf 5, no. 2 (2019): 153–81. https://doi.org/10.53429/spiritualis.v5i2.66.
Umam, Mohammad Hotibul, and M. Lutfi Mustofa. “Data field Richard C. Martin Dalam Pendekatan Studi Islam.” Qolamuna : Jurnal Studi Islam 8, no. 1 (July 30, 2022): 30–45. https://doi.org/10.55120/qolamuna.v8i1.656.
Zuhriyah, Luluk Fikri. “Metode Dan Pendekatan Dalam Studi Islam: Pembacaan Atas Pemikiran Charles J. Adams.” Dalam Jurnal ISLAMICA 2, no. 1 (2007).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Moch. Muwaffiqillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
