Pertentangan antara Wahyu dan Akal sebagai al-Dakhīl dalam Tafsir: Kajian terhadap Kitab Dar’ Ta‘āruḍ Karya Ibn Taymiyah

Authors

  • Anillahi Ilham Akbar Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya - Indonesia
  • Abdul Kadir Riyadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya - Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v6i2.300

Keywords:

Infiltration in the Qur’anic Interpretation, the authenticity of quranic interpretation, al-dalīl al-naqli wa al-dalil al-‘aqli, revelation and sense

Abstract

The relevance of revelation and sense especially regarding the contradiction between the two is a problem that is often discussed by Muslim intellectual. Most of the scholars tend to reject the existence of a contradiction between revelation and sense, they argue that it should be so because basically they both come from the Almighty God, so it is impossible for the two to be contradictory. This of course will affect the authenticity of the resulting interpretation and will cause defects in it. Based on this, intellectual anxiety arises about how the scholars respond to this matter, which in this study will be devoted to the response of Ibn Taymiyah in his book Dar’ Ta'āruḍ al-'Aql wa al-Naql, and how its relevance to the concept of al-dakhīl (infiltration) in the interpretation of the Qur'an. This study is a literature review by examining the book Dar’ Ta'āruḍ al-'Aql wa al-Naql by Ibn Taymiyyah and several writings related to this topic. This results in an understanding that the assumptions that say there is a contradiction between revelation and sense in the book are unacceptable. Ibn Taymiyah also emphasized that although it was forced to be possible for a conflict between the two to occur, the conflict that occurred was on the status of  dalīl that was qaṭ'ī-ẓannī, not on its status as revelation and sense. The contradiction that occurs between revelation and sense can ultimately be categorized as al-dakhīl fī al-tafsīr, as one of the factors that causes the authenticity of interpretation to disappear.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fa>yad, ‘Abd al-Wahha>b. al-Dakhi>l fi> al-Tafsi>r al-Qur’a>n al-Kari>m. Kairo: Mat{ba’ah H}assa>n, 1978.

Fasiha, “Pemikiran Ekonomi Ibnu Taymiyah”. Al-Amwal 1, No. 2 (2017).

Hutasuhut, Efrianto. “Akal dan Wahyu dalam Islam (Perbandingan Pemikiran Harun Nasution dan Muhammad Abduh)”. Tesis, Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara Medan, 2017.

Khali>fah, Ibra>hi>m ‘Abd al-Rah}ma>n Muh}ammad. al-Dakhi>l fi> al-Tafsi>r. Kairo: Maktabah al-I>ma>n li al-T{aba>’ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi>’, 2018.

Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf al-Qur’an Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya Edisi Penyempurnaan. Jakarta: ttp, 2019.

M, Mirzan Huda. “Fungsi Akal dan Wahyu dalam Teologi Islam (Studi Pemikiran Muhammad Iqbal)”. Skripsi, UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 2018.

Makfi, Muhammad Miqdam. “Relasi Agama dan Sains dalam Pemikiran Teologi Ibn Taymiyyah; Studi Kritis Buku Dar’u Ta’arrudl al-‘Aql wa al-Naql”. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains 4, (2022).

Masbukin dan Alimuddin Hassan. “Akal dan Wahyu; Antara Perdebatan dan Pembelaan dalam Sejarah”. Toleransi: Media Komunikasi Umat Beragama 8, no. 2 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/trs.v8i2.2476

Masyhud. “Pemikiran Ibn Taimiyah tentang Metode Penafsiran al-Qur’an sebagai upaya Pemurnian Pemahaman terhadap al-Qur’an”. Jurnal Penelitian Agama 9, No. 2 (2008): 1-13.

Muniroh, Badlatul. “Akal dan Wahyu (Studi Komparatif antara Pemikiran Imam al-Ghazali dan Harun Nasution)”. Aqlania 9, No. 1 (2018): 41-71. https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v9i01.2062.

Muslimin, A. “Pemikiran Politik Hukum Ibnu Taymiyah dalam Kitab as-Siya>sah asy-Syar’iyyah fi Is}la’i wa ar-Ra>’iyyah dan Relevansinya dalam Perkembangan Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia”. Disertasi, Pascasrjana UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 2020.

Nopendra, Riandra. “Konsep Kepemimpinan Non Muslim di Negara Muslim Menurut Pandangan Ibnu Taimiyah dan Yusuf al-Qardhawi”. Skripsi, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, 2018.

Qamaruzzaman. “Pemikiran Politik Ibnu Taimiyah”. POLITEA: Jurnal Kajian Politik Islam 2, No. 2 (2019):111-129. https://doi.org/10.20414/politea.v2i2.1507

Salim, Amir, dkk. “Pemikiran Ibnu Taimiyah dalam Harga, Pasar dan Hak Milik”. Ekonomica Sharia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah 6, No. 2 (2021): 155-166. https://doi.org/10.36908/esha.v6i2.207

Sefriyanti dan Mahmud Arif. “Aspek Pemikiran Ibnu Taymiyah di Dunia Islam”. Jurnal Kajian Agama Hukum dan Pendidikan Islam (KAHPI) 3, No. 2 (2021): 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/kahpi.v3i2.p82-88.17549

Shihab, ¬¬ Quraish. Logika Agama. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2017.

Syaikhon, Muhammad. “Pemikiran Hukum Islam Ibnu Taimiyyah”. Jurnal Lisan al-Hal 7, no. 2 (2015): 331-348.

Syamsuddin, Mukhtasar. “Hubungan Wahyu dan Akal dalam Tradisi Filsafat Islam”. Arete 1, No. 2 (2012): 127-148. https://doi.org/10.33508/arete.v1i2.173

Taymiyyah, Ibn. Dar’ Ta’a>rud} al-‘Aql wa al-Naql, Juz 1. Arab Saudi: Ida>rah al-Thaqa>fah wa al-Nashr bi al-Ja>mi’ah, 1991.

Ulfah, Maria. “Akal dan Wahyu dalam Islam (Perbandingan Pemikiran Antara Muhammad Abduh dan Harun Nasution)”. Skripsi, IAIN Walisongo Semarang, 2009.

Ulinnuha, Muhammad. Metode Kritik Ad-Dakhi>l fit-Tafsi>r: Cara Mendeteksi Adanya Infiltrasi dan Kontaminasi dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Qaf Media Kreativa, 2019.

Yunus, Mahmud. Kamus Arab Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahmud Yunus Wa Dzurriyyah, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Akbar, A. I., & Riyadi, A. K. (2022). Pertentangan antara Wahyu dan Akal sebagai al-Dakhīl dalam Tafsir: Kajian terhadap Kitab Dar’ Ta‘āruḍ Karya Ibn Taymiyah. QOF, 6(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v6i2.300

Issue

Section

Articles