KARYAWAN ALFAMART KINIBALU KOTA PALANGKA RAYA SEBAGAI CHEERFUL ROBOTS

Authors

  • Juli Natalia Silalahi Universitas Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v4i2.969

Keywords:

Cheerful Robots, Alfamart Employees, Ratio Work, Objective Reality

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the meaning of work rationality for Alfamart employees (Crew, ACOS, COS) while serving at PT. Sumber Alfaria Tri Jaya, TBK (Alfamart). The benefits of research are criticizing the workings of capitalism in the objective reality of Alfamart employees. Meaning was analyzed using the perspective of C. Wright Mills about Cheerful Robots. Rationality in Mills's perspective that ratio work must precede objective reality, because objective reality is the exploitation of the human ratio. The present social reality  is not the work of ratio work, but the work of technology. Accordingly, Alfamart employees understand their work as technological work, not ratio work. lfamart makes the reproduction of excited robots that are workers who are ready to run Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) from PT. Sumber Alfaria Tri Jaya, TBK. The method used is qualitative research with a qualitative descriptive approach. The results of this study indicate: 1. Alfamart employees do not have the creative  power to speak out about the discomfort they get, because all of that is covered with sweet promises from the company. Though the promise is not certain, and the income obtained by Alfamart employees is very far from the owner of PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya and structural position holders (Korwil, Inventory  Collection/IC, Directors, President Commissioners, etc.). 2. Without realizing by  this Alfamart employee that they become Cheerful Robots that are driven by PT. Sumber Alfaria Tri Yaya, Tbk. They consider this work to be fine, even though  they know there is a loss they are getting, but it is considered fairness and responsibility. They lose their reason and autonomy of mind.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, John W. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset Memilih di Antara

Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darmanto, Didik. 2007. Menara Gading Ilmu dan Ilmuwan Sosial: Kritik Teori Kritis

terhadap Positivisme. Di unduh http://filsafat-ekawenats.blogspot.com/2007/01/menaragading-ilmu-dan-ilmuwan-sosial.html, diakses 12 November 2019

Denzin, Norman K dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. Terjemahan buku asli Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Guy, Oakes. 2014. The Politics Of Truth Reconsidered C. Wright Mills As Radical Social Theorist. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14: 253-265

Marzuki, Suparman. 2006. “Kekerasan, ketakutan pada kekerasan”. UNISIA Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. 61(29): 317-330.

Ormsbee, J. Todd. 2017. The Cheerful Robots of Academia: Intellectual Craftsmanship and the Neoliberal University. Urbana: PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION 2017

Rochadi, Sigit. 2005. “Anatomi Teori Elit Kekuasaan Dan Teori Imaginasi Sosiologi C. Wright Mills”. Sosiologika. 4(12): 1-13.

Sztompka, Piotr. (2010). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial, Jakarta: Prenada Media. Sztompka, P. (1994). The Sociology of Social Change, UK: Blacwell Publishers.

Tribiwono, Adarmawan. (2006). Gerakan Sosial, Wahana Civil Society Bagi Demokratisasi, Jakarata: LP3ES.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-30

How to Cite

Silalahi, J. N. (2023). KARYAWAN ALFAMART KINIBALU KOTA PALANGKA RAYA SEBAGAI CHEERFUL ROBOTS. Asketik: Jurnal Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v4i2.969