Persepsi Generasi Z Terhadap Toleransi Beragama di Media Sosial

Authors

  • Leryani Mince Maria Manuain Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0455-5460
  • Osian Orjumi Moru Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia
  • Trijuliani Renda Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia
  • Junita Naitboho Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v6i2.269

Keywords:

Perception, generation z, religious tolerance, social media

Abstract

This research regards a perception of Generation z in Kupang to tolerance religion on Social Media and influencing factors perception of Generation z Kupang City To Tolerance Religious on Social Media. Study this using method study combination (mixed methods). In a study, this researcher collects, analyzes data, integrates findings, and describes a conclusion with combined method study qualitative and quantitative. The average score perception generation z against tolerance of religion on social media seen from indicators of Fairness, empathy and reasonableness is at one category enough, that is by 64.1 %. In line with that, the results of qualitative data show that the average generation z is tolerant of differences that exist, but attitude intolerant sometimes appears influenced by internal factors, namely: Experiencing life with different experiencing life together Becomes a factor of mutual understanding. Understanding to teachings of religion Becomes a factor that shapes positive perceptions _ and is hostile towards people, religious others, and with live values and spirit nationality, generation z tends to own a positive perception _ about tolerance of religion. In using social media, they put forward identity and nationality. Different people's confidence with they responded and greeted by cheerful. Referring to on conclusion above, the Institution or institution education needs to develop a curriculum that answers the need for public tolerance of religion and also needs _ the existence of specialization about attitude tolerant in the use of social media by wise

Author Biographies

Leryani Mince Maria Manuain, Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia

-

Osian Orjumi Moru, Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia

-

References

Amin, M. (1992). Al-Mujtama’ al-Islami, trans. Abdul Majid Khudori. Fikahati Aneska.

Asiyah BM, S. (2014). Konflik Sosial dalam Hubunga Antar Umat Beragama. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 15(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v15i2.348

Bakar, O. (2010). The Evolving Face of Religious Tolerance in Post-Colonial Malaysia: Understanding Its Shaping Factors. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 2(4), 621-638,765. http://www.icrjournal.org/icr/index.php/icr/article/view/104

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.) (4th ed.). Pearson Education , Inc.

Dewi, D. K., & Triandika, L. S. (2020). Konstruksi Toleransi pada Akun Media Sosial Jaringan Gusdurian. Lentera, 4(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.21093/lentera.v4i1.2159

Hermawati, R., Paskarina, C., & Runiawati, N. (2017). Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama di Kota Bandung. Umbara, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v1i2.10341

Hiandarto, E. E., Sikiani, D., Dhara Sasmita, H., Herdiyanto, Y. K., & Tobing, D. H. (2021). TOLERANCE AS A CONFLICT’S SOLUTION.

Hui, J. Y. (2010). The internet in Indonesia: Development and impact of radical websites. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 33(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100903400605

Iswanto, I., & Rantesalu, M. B. (2020). Kajian Toleransi Dalam Teks Cerita Rakyat Masyarakat Rote di Nusa Tenggara Timur. BIA’: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen Kontekstual, 3(2), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.34307/b.v3i2.126

Masduki, M. (2014). Filosofi Interaksi Sosial Lintas Agama: Wawasan Islam. TOLERANSI: Media Ilmiah Komunikasi Umat Beragama, 6(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.24014/trs.v6i1.900

Mowery, D. C., & Simcoe, T. (2002). Is the Internet a US invention? - An economic and technological history of computer networking. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00069-0

Nugraha, Y., & Firmansyah, Y. (2019). Karakter Toleransi Beragama dalam Sudut Pandang Generasi Milenial. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 4(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v4i2.3856

Paramitha, S. (2019). PENGARUH BERITA TOLERANSI BERAGAMA DI MEDIA ONLINE TERHADAP SIKAP TOLERANSI SISWA KELAS 3 SMA DI PEKANBARU. JOM FISIP, 6(1), 1–6.

Sandriansyah, S. (2020). Islam dan Internet: Toleransi Beragama di Dunia Maya. FOKUS Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan, 5(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.29240/jf.v5i2.1938

setara. (2020). Ringkasan Eksekutif Indeks Kota Toleran 2020.pdf - Google Drive. In Setara Institut. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X3_ou-vYx3f7GHDzcFPKHeAA-m69mbyr/view

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (Sutopo (ed.); 8th ed.). CV ALFABETA.

Suradi, A., Kenedi, J., & Surahman, B. (2020). Religious Tolerance in Multicultural Communities: Towards a Comprehensive Approach in Handling Social Conflict. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 4(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.24843/ujlc.2020.v04.i02.p06

Susilo, R. D. (2008). 20 Tokoh Sosiologi Modern. AR_RUZZ MEDIA.

Tholkhah, I. (2013). PENDIDIKAN TOLERANSI KEAGAMAAN: Studi Kasus SMA Muhammadiyah Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v11i2.432

Wijoyo, H., Indrawan, I., Cahyono, Y., Handoko, A. L., & Santamako, R. (2020). (PDF) GENERASI Z & REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0. Pena Persada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343416519_GENERASI_Z_REVOLUSI_INDUSTRI_40

Yunus, F. M., Ushuluddin, F., Islam, U., & Uin, N. (2014). KONFLIK AGAMA DI INDONESIA PROBLEM DAN SOLUSI PEMECAHANNYA. Substantia, 16, 217–228.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Manuain, L. M. M. ., Moru, O. O., Renda, T., & Naitboho, J. (2022). Persepsi Generasi Z Terhadap Toleransi Beragama di Media Sosial. Asketik: Jurnal Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 6(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v6i2.269