Dynamics of Muktazilah Theological Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v9i1.2624Keywords:
Mu‘tazilite, Theological School, Islamic Creed, Rationality, LibertyAbstract
The paper examines historical development of Mu‘tazilite theological school of thought which arises from speculative method and influences of Greek thought that sparked the discursive tradition of early Islamic intellectual history. This essentially brought forth by the textualist and rationalist school and their classical debate that had formative influence in the rational school developed by the Mu‘tazilite in the early century. The paper studies the history and development of Mu‘tazilite theology and their conceptual and doctrinal impact on modern neo-Mu‘tazilite works. The study is based on classical works that gives significant textual and interpretive history of Mu‘tazilism. It uses qualitative method based on documentary survey and content analysis. The data were collected from related primary and secondary sources and analyzed using descriptive, normative, historical and jurisdictional approaches in order to make accurate and scientific conclusions. The finding shows that the ideology developed by the Mu‘tazilite were meant to respond to the foreign influence of deviant sects of the heretics, Magians, Manichaeism, atheism, naturalist and materialist by refuting their philosophical premises. This contributes to the development of kalam or speculative theology thanks to the flowering of Mu‘tazilite theology and their rational expression that help to foster higher ethical and religious norms and consciousness and influences contemporary thought that espouses neo-Mu‘tazilite outlook in the context of dakwah and the return to reason and their enlightened movement.
Downloads
References
A. Hanafi. Pengantar Theologi Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Husna, 1983.
Abdul Aziz, Dahlan. Teologi dan Akidah dalam Islam. Padang: IAIN Imam Bonjol, 2001.
Abu Zahrah, Muhammad. Aliran Politik dan Aqidah dalam Islam. Jakarta: Logos, 1996.
Ahmad, Amin. Duha al-Islam, cet. 9. Kaherah: Maktabat al-Nahdah al-Misriyah, 1977.
Ahmad, Subhi. Al-Falsafah al-Akhlaqiyah fi’l-Fikr al-Islamiy. Kaherah: Daarul Maarif, 1969.
Akyol, Mustafa. Reopening Muslim Minds: A Return to Reason, Freedom and Tolerance. New York: St. Martin’s Essentials, 2021.
Amir, Ahmad Nabil. “Pengaruh Rasionalisme Abduh dalam Pemikiran Harun Nasution.” Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keislaman 8, no. 1 (2020): 52-71.
Analiansyah. “Peran Akal dan Kebebasan Bertindak dalam Filsafat Ketuhanan Mu‘tazilah.” Jurnal Substantia 15, no. 1 (April 2013): 91-103.
Ash-Shiddieqy, Muhammad Hasbi. Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Tauhid/Kalam. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 1999.
Ayub. “Mu‘tazila in Western Scholarship: Their Origin, Originality and Legacy.” Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies 1, no. 2 (2021): 80-103.
Azra, Azyumardi. Konteks Berteologi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1992.
Bruce, B. Lawrence. Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989.
Dik, Hartoko. Orientasi di dalam Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1986.
Elly Warnisyah Harahap, dkk. “Epistemologi Pemikiran Mu‘tazilah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam di Indonesia.” Mimbar Kampus: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Agama Islam 23, No. 2 (2024): 1152–1164. https://doi.org/10.17467/mk.v.23i2.3725.
Eliza. “Kontribusi Muktazilah dalam Penyebaran Dakwah Islam.” Al-Hikmah 3 (2011): 91-101.
Elpianti, S. Pakpahan. “Pemikiran Mu‘tazilah.” Al-Hadi 2, no. 2 (Januari-Jun 2017): 413-423.
Faisol, M. Fatawi. Kata Pengantar, Al-Mu‘tazilah wa Mushkilah al-Hurriyah al-Insaniyah. (edisi Melayu). Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Renaissance Front, 2020.
Hamka. Prinsip dan Kebijaksanaan Dakwah Islam cet. 1. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2018.
Imarah, Muhammad. Al-Mu‘tazilah wa Mushkilah al-Hurriyyah al-Insaniyyah, cet. 2. Kaherah: Dar al-Shorouk, 1988.
Imarah, Muhammad, ed. Ahl al-‘Adl wa’l-Tauhid. T.t.p.: Dar al-Hilal, 1971.
Imarah, Muhammad. Muktazilah dan Persoalan Kebebasan Insan, diterjemahkan oleh Ahmad Nabil Amir. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Renaissance Front, 2020.
Khaidir, Piet Hizbullah. Rangsang Sari, Al-Mu‘tazilah wa Mushkilah al-Hurriyah al-Insaniyah. (edisi Melayu). Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Renaissance Front, 2020.
M., Baharudin. “Paham Teologi Rasional Mu‘tazilah di Indonesia.” Al-Adyan V, no. 1 (Januari-Juni, 2010): 99–104.
Nasution, Harun. “The Place of Reason in Abduh’s Theology: Its Impact on his Theological System and Views.” Tesis Ph.D., Institute of Islamic Studies, McGill University, Montreal, 1968.
Nasution, Harun. Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran, Sejarah, Analisa, Perbandingan. Jakarta: Yayasan Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, 1978, Jakarta: UI Press, 1986.
Nasution, Harun. Kaum Mu‘tazilah dan Pandangan Agama. Jakarta: Yayasan Threedharma Utama, 1979.
Nasution, Harun. Pembaharuan dalam Islam: Sejarah Pemikiran dan Gerakan. Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang, 1991.
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1992.
Revoluna, Zyde Khaidir. “Muhammad Imarah dan Islam Wasatiyah.” Ibtimes.id, June 02, 2020. http://www.ibtimes.id/muhammad-imarah-dan-islam-wasatiyah. (Web Page)
Richard C. Martin, Mark R. Woodward, Dwi S. Atmaja. Defenders of Reason in Islam, Mu‘tazilism from Medieval School to Modern Symbol. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 1997.
Rohidin. “Mu‘tazilah; Sejarah dan Perkembangannya.” El-Afkar 7, no. II (Juli-Desember 2018): 1-10.
Supriyanto. “Periodisation of the Philosophy of Islamic Rationalism in the Perspective of Zaki Naguib Mahmud.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 79, no. 1 (2023): 1-7.
Zulhelmi. “Epistemologi Pemikiran Mu‘tazilah Pengaruhnya terhadap Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam di Indonesia.” Intizar 20, no. 1 (March 23, 2014): 1-16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Nabil Amir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.