TELAAH EPISTEMOLOGI POSITIVISME DAN FENOMENOLOGI

(SEBUAH PERBANDINGAN)

Authors

  • Muhammad Sanusi Mahasiswa Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Antropologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Epistemology, Positivism, Phenomenology, Social-cultural Science, Natural Science

Abstract

Epistemology is begun based on the need for philosophy used to recite social-cultural events. Nowadays, the development of epistemology is fast enough as proof of thinking way which is growing in academics and research, especially in social-cultural science. The growing epistemology is positivism, materialism,
structuralism, hermeneutics, and phenomenology. Epistemology does not appear explicitly in research yet it is always there. Scientists and researchers should be aware of what epistemology is to use. It gives the benefit of the strength of the research. This article delivers about growing epistemology in social sciences. The two kinds of epistemology discussed in this article used a comparison approach; that is comparing both to find out the similarities and differences. Positivism is epistemology used in much social-cultural research while phenomenology responds to positivism and shows criticism of it.

References

Abdul Rahman Sholeh, 2005. Pendidikan Agama dan Pengembangn untuk Bangsa, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafi ndo Persada

Ahimsa Putra, H. S. 1997. Antropologi Koentjaraningrat: Sebuah Tafsir Epistemologi

dalam Koentjaraningrat dan Antropologi di Indonesia. Hal. 25-48. Editor: E. K. M.

Masinambow. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Ahimsa Putra, H. S. 2012. Fenomenologi Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi untuk Memahami Agama. Jurnal IAIN Walisongo. Vol. 20. Nomor. 2. November 2012.

Ulumuddin. 2006. Jurgen Habermas dan Hermeneutika Kritis (Sebuah Gerakan Evolusi

Sosial). Jurnal Hunafa. Vol. 3. No. 1. 1 Maret 2006.

Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa. 2008. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.

Sudarminta, J.. 2002. Epistemologi Dasar: Pengantar Filsafat Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta.

Kanisius.

Riley, Dylan. 2007. The Paradox of Positivisme. Social Science History, Vol. 31, No. 1

(Spring, 2007), pp. 115-126. Diambil dari: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40267932 (26 Oktetober 2017).

Bryant, Christopher G.A.. 1985. Positivism in Social Theory and Research: Theoritical

Traditions in The Social Sciences. London: Macmillan Publisher.

Subchi, Imam. 2001. Dialog Kebudayaan: Teori dan Metodologi (Perspektif Antropologi).

Jakarta. Jurnal Mimbar Agama dan Budaya. Vol. XVIII. No. 4.

Watloly, Ahliab. 2001. Tanggungjawab Pengetahuan: Mempertimbangkan Epistemologi secara Kultural. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Russell, Betrand. 2007. Sejarah Filsafat Barat; Kaitannya dengan Kondisi Sosio-politik

Zaman Kuno Hingga Sekarang. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Raco, J.R. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Jenis, Karakter dan Keunggulannya. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Hasbiansyah, O. 2008. Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi. Mediator. Vol. 9. No. 1. Juni 2008.

Sukarno, B. 2005. Tinjauan Filosofi s tentang Pancasila sebagai Filsafat. Solo: Sebelas

Maret University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-09

How to Cite

Sanusi, M. (2023). TELAAH EPISTEMOLOGI POSITIVISME DAN FENOMENOLOGI: (SEBUAH PERBANDINGAN). Asketik: Jurnal Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 2(1). Retrieved from https://jurnalfuda.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/asketik/article/view/1086