Evaluation of Implementation of Post-Transition Management Post Report by Provincial Government
(Case Study at State Senior High School 19 and State Senior High School 20 Surabaya)
Keywords:
Evaluation, Implementation, e-RaporAbstract
Precisely As of January 2017, Senior High School / Senior Vocational School officially managed the province. Naming Online Reports become an e-report card. Online report cards can be accessed by guardians and students wherever located. While the online report card still can not be accessed publicly. Accessible only by teacher, admin/operator. Match Evaluation Research Results: The e-Rapor Policy is appropriate and feasible to maintain. The e-Rapor policy does not require a new policy as a replacement. Evaluation of Effectiveness: Facilitate the
incorporation of scores, chart student scores and also counseling guidance and connect with DAPODIK Center. Service Performance B or Satisfactory, Evaluation Efficiency: Input issued with the output/output of e-report cards is comparable. The effect of e-Rapor is efficient. Meta Evaluation: This e-Rapor evaluation is performed by Provincial School Trustees professionally per semester Evaluation result e - Reports into school considerations in taking the policy. Factors That Become Constraints: The e-Rapor application often updates the system. Have
not yet adjusted the e-Rapor Application with the revised 2013 curriculum. Technically e-Rapor application is classified as a heavy application.4) Limit Description KIKD 60 characters. Suggestions and recommendations: For School Parties: Continue to upgrade the server and speed to increase e-Rapor access. For Kemendikbud: The application of e-Rapor is technically not heavy. 3) No Limitations of 60 characters for KIKD description. In the future, e-Rapor can be accessed by parents.
Downloads
References
Abdul Wahab, Solichin, 2001, Analisis Kebijakan Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijakan Negara, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Budi Winarno. 2007. Kebijakan Publik: Teori dan Proses. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Badjuri, Abdulkahar & Yuwono, Teguh, 2002, Kebijakan Publik Konsep & Strategi, Undip Press, Semarang
Dunn, W. 2003, Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Edisi Kedua, Gajah Mada University
Press, Jogjakarta
Dye, R. Thomas, 1987, Understanding Public Policy, Prentice – Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey.
Dunn, W. 2000. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta:Gadjah Mada Univercity Press, Jogjakarta.
Ekowati, Mas Roro Lilik, 2005, Perencanaan, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan atau
Program, Edisi Revisi, PT Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Islamy, Irfan M, 2001, Prinsip-prinsip Perumusan Kebijakan Negara, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Koentjoroningrat. 1991. Metode-metode penelirian kualitatif . Bandung: PT. Remaja
Rosda Karya
Laswell, harold D 1984 politise, who, gets, what, when, how. Dalam Agustinus, Leo. 2006.
Politik dan kebijakan publik. Bandung :AIPI
Moleong Lexy MA. 2002, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : Remaja Rosda Karya
Miles, Matthew dan Huberman, A. Michael. 2009. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakrata : UI
Press.
Santoso, Purwo (et.al), Modul Pembelajaran Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Yogyakarta:
Research Center for Politics and Government, Jurusan Politik dan Pemerintahan UGM, 2010.
Samodra, Wibawa., Yuyun Prabukusumo dan Agus Pramusinto. 1994. Evaluasi Kebijakan
Publik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudiyono. 1992. Model Penelitian Evaluasi (Evaluasi Dampak Program) Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Fisipol. UGM Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono, 2003. Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Bandung.Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas
Wibawa, Samodra, dkk, 1994, Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Roekminiati, Chistiana Astuti, Sri Kamariyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.